JoshBlogs is proud to present FantasySCOTUS.net, the Premier Supreme Court Fantasy League.
The Rules are simple. For each case the Supreme Court grants cert, predict:
|
![]() |
Now you can play like the Tenth Justice at FantasySCOTUS.net.
JoshBlogs is proud to present FantasySCOTUS.net, the Premier Supreme Court Fantasy League.
The Rules are simple. For each case the Supreme Court grants cert, predict:
|
![]() |
Now you can play like the Tenth Justice at FantasySCOTUS.net.
November 12, 2009 at 2:38 pm
I don’t understand the “fragmented”category. Could you please give some examples of past decisions that would be considered “fragmented”? For instance, when a negative commerce clause decision is delivered where 6 justices agree there is no violation, 4 explaining how they see the decision fitting with SCOTUS precedent, Scalia because it doesn’t fit in the narrow category of cases where he is willing to enforce the “clause”, and Thomas because he will never vote to invoke it, is this a straight 6-3 ruling? Or is this considered “fragmented”?